![]() The CDC officially stopped reporting aggregate COVID-19 case counts months ago, noting that data had become less representative of actual infections or transmission levels over time.Īs case counts started to become less reliable, some experts first pointed to hospitalization metrics as a reasonable substitute to gauge transmission. But the rise of rapid home tests - and general waning of public interest in testing at all - has all but erased the ability to grasp current case counts nationwide. Tracking COVID-19 trends has always had its challenges. And IHME estimates from that time suggest that the US was in one of the worst waves of the pandemic, second only to the Omicron surge. In mid-December, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was reporting about 500,000 cases a week. Mokdad declined to quantify an estimate for current case counts, but he said he’s been getting lots of calls and questions about COVID-19 recently - similar to what he experienced around the end of last year. “We felt that the margin of error became really too big for us to make a prediction that we could stand by and defend.” “The surveillance system was not adequate anymore to capture changes in COVID-19,” he said. But the research institute paused that modeling in December.Īll of the measures that factored into the model had stopped being reported or had changed in some way, said Ali Mokdad, professor of health metrics sciences and chief strategy officer of population health at the University of Washington. “And we should be paying attention to it, because we are starting to see an increase.”įrom 2020 to 2022, the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation produced regular estimates of COVID-19 case rates and projections for trends. For example, someone may be able to continue to “see” a picture they have been shown for 30 seconds, even a few minutes after the picture is removed.“There is more transmission out there than what the surveillance data indicates,” said Janet Hamilton, executive director of the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. Eidetic memory is the ability to vividly recall an image you are exposed to, but only briefly. The idea of an eidetic memory is similar to that of a photographic memory, but the two are not exactly the same. Results from one study suggest that people with HSAM are no better at acquiring memories – they are not superior learners – but are simply better at retaining memories. Doctors have yet to understand what exactly is happening in the brains of individuals with HSAM, and tests reveal there is no particular ability that appears to underpin the condition. Their memories are exceptional, but certainly not as perfect as actual photographs. ![]() For example, they may be able to tell you what they ate for lunch on (and that it was a Saturday). People with HSAM can recall past events in great detail, along with the exact dates when they occurred. Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory (HSAM) is a condition that has been identified in fewer than 100 people worldwide. ![]() ![]() And some people do have better visual memory than others. Generally, we’re better at remembering what we’ve seen than what we’ve heard. Although many people claim that they have it, we still don’t have proof that it actually exists. Photographic memory is the ability to recall a past scene in detail with great accuracy – just like a photograph. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |